these practices under Article 102 TFEU is still very much alive ten years later.8 The GC did not depart from the principles set out in previous cases, pursuant to which exclusive dealing and loyalty rebates are, absent an objective justification, prohibited as abusive irrespective of the effects they produce on the market.9 This book review the concept of abuse in eu petition . Mr McClung, the claimant, started working as a subcontractor at an energy site . With the further development of the ECJ case law, other criteria have also been developed which are used to ascertain abuse by refusal to supply. An equivalent of ancillary restraints and economic efficiency criteria of Article 101 (3) TFEU apply under Article 102 TFEU to exempt otherwise illegal behaviour. Article 102 TFEU (ex Article 82 EC, ex Article 86 EC) Objective justification: The prohibition set out in Article 102 TFEU does not prohibit conduct that is objectively justified and proportionate, or where the behaviour is counterbalanced or outweighed by pro-consumer efficiency-benefits. 26. 9 - Article 102 TFEU from Part II - The role of environmental protection in EU competition law and policy in practice Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2011 Suzanne Kingston Chapter Get access Summary A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As such, there is no concept Abstract This paper provides a reasoned "fact-check" on some of the recurring criticisms concerning the European Commission's handling of efficiency claims under Article 102 TFEU, which are brought forward in practitioner and academic circles, formally and informally, for instance in the context of blog posts, conferences and seminars. Dominance and the relevant market 4. Article 102 TFEU prohibits the dominant undertakings to abuse their market position. 2.1 The Introduction of the "SIEC Test" into Section 36 GWB and Its Effects on Ministerial Approvals Pursuant to Section 42 GWB. [6] 3. the . Objective justification # 3 1. [i] The dominant undertaking may provide a justification either by demonstrating that its conduct is objectively necessary or by demonstrating that its conduct produces substantial efficiencies the outweigh any anticompetitive effects on consumers. For a detailed assessment of 'objective justification under Article 102TFEU see P. Loe-wenthal, The Defence of "Objective Justification ' in the Application of Article 82 EC (2005) 28 World Competition 455. Article 102 is directed towards the unilateral conduct of dominant firms which act in an abusive manner. In this regard the possibility of objective justifications for such abuses is not included in the scope of this article as previous practice on these abuses shows that this defense possibility is almost never addressed. This thesis submits that is very important to tackle with the formalistic approach and adopt the effect- based approach in the examination of Article 102 TFEU and of objective justifications. The Commission, similarly to its approach under Article 101 (1), also recently developed a more economic approach towards Article 102 TFEU which would lead to those exclusionary practices which can be proven to be economically efficient, not being considered as abuse. In . XX Contents 6.6.1 Introduction 343 6.6.2 Meeting Competition 344 - II. EUR Lex Access European Union law English current language EUR Lex EUR Lex Sign Register recent searches Select site language This document excerpt from the EUR Lex website Menu. 2020. - III. During the recent years, however, the European Commission and a number of National Competition. There cannot be objective justification for the refusal; The access must be indispensable to carrying on the other persons's business, and There must be no actual or potential substitute for it. The Intel judgment of the Court of Justice. 102 See Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs in Case C-53/03 Synetairismos Farmakopoion Aitolias & Akarnanias (Syfait) and Others v Glaxo . The prohibition of abuse of dominance under Article 102 TFEU aims to protect competitors and consumers from unilateral harmful behavior by an undertaking which occupies a dominant position within the internal market or a substantial part of it. article 102 tfeu prohibits exclusionary abuse, which is defined as an abuse "by which an undertaking reaps the economic benefits resulting from its heightened degree of independence". Article 102 TFEU governs abusive conduct by dominant undertakings. Reference for a preliminary ruling - Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector - Confidentiality of communications - Providers of electronic communications services - General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data - Directive 2002/58/EC - Article 15(1) - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 6, 7, 8 and 11 . It considers the case law of the EU Courts, the decisional practice of the Commission, and the Commission's Guidance Paper on enforcement priorities, and the . Introduction 2. If an objective justification is successfully invoked, the Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) prohibition does not apply. Not all collectively dominant conduct will violate Article 102 TFEU. Such . ARTICLE 102 TFEU 334 6.6 OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION 343. Such abuse may, in particular, consist in: The European Commission Decision. This approach would be similar to the screens that are commonly applied in the EU in article 102 TFEU ("Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union") (article 82 EC ("Treaty Establishing the European Community")) . Now, a different debate is whether an "objective justification" defense is a mere chimera or not, and there, I do agree that it should be a real possible defense, not just some . Article 102 and the culmination of the author's years of research in the area of abuse of dominance. In the EU, unilateral or 'dominant' firm conduct is governed by Article 102 TFEU. Module 2: Competition Law Article 102 In brief, Article 102 of the TFEU is directed towards unilateral conduct of dominant firms - II.1. "This provision (Art. Effect on trade between Member States . Article 102 (ex Article 82 TEC) Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the internal market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the internal market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States. Introduction. Article 102 (c): applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a The Minister for the Cabinet Office makes these Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by section 2(2) of, as read with paragraph 1A F3 of Schedule 2 to, that Act.. article 102 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union { tfeu} (formerly under article 82 of the european community treaty (ec)) prohibits dominant undertakings from abusing their position within an internal market or in a substantial part of it, as incompatible with the internal market in so far as it affects trade between member Background. an infringement without shifting the objective burden of proof,2 or sustain the existence of efficiencies that would compensate the restrictive effects. Theme 3: Abuse of a dominant position Topics: - Article 102 TFUE: Dominance, abuse, objective justification - Review and assessment of the most frequent abusive practices under Article 102 TFEU Basic Reading: - Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - EC Commission Guidance Paper on exclusionary Case #4: The . After briefly examining how efficiencies have previously been taken into account in the decisional practice of the European Commission and the case law of the European Courts, this article reviews the two-step approach set out in the recently adopted Guidance Paper on Abusive Exclusionary Conduct. Undertaking 3. There is the need for a clear definition regarding the term objective justification, which will enhance the legal certainty. This Practice Note details the approach to rebates of both the European Commission and the EU Courts, including the Intel case, placing developments in the context of the wider debate surrounding whether competition authorities should adopt a formalist or more economic (effects-based) based approach to Article 102 TFEU. and there is no clear objective justification.24 Another contrast with article 102 is also worth discussing. Enable / Disable all experimental features; Replacement of CELEX identifiers by short titles - experimental feature. As established and confirmed in several cases before EU courts and the commission, prima facie abusive conduct by dominant firms will be acceptable for one of three reasons: Objective Justification; Efficiencies; Abuse in relation to proprietary rights The Standard in Article 101 TFEU; A Potential Reference Point for Article 102 TFEU Identifying some types of conduct as having an anti-competitive object within Article 102 TFEU is likely to have its origin in Article 101 TFEU. Dominant firms that are accused of abusive behaviour may try to invoke an objective justification. A few days ago I asked Pablo in public (following some private teasing) whether there is any Article 102 TFEU decision adopted by the Commission that he liked. Law, Business. These conditions mirror those of the efficiency defence under Article 101 (3) TFEU. Rules and standards in Article 102 TFEU case law: A first inescapable fact is that the ECJ requires evidence of an anticompetitive effect in some cases but not in others. Article 102 TFEU Diganth Raj Sehgal Dominant position Julija Jerneva Compt. the court of justice has made clear that the reach of article 102 tfeu is not cut down simply because the conduct in question complies with another legal rule. This chapter discusses the difficult concept of what constitutes an 'abuse' of a dominant position for the purposes of Article 102 and whether conduct should be condemned on account of the form it takes or only for its effects. The objective is to remove the compatibility of third party technologies with a dominant firm's product, or to impair competing technologies' operations. Article 102 (a): directly or indirectly imposing unfair selling prices or other unfair conditions Discriminatory abuses - Practices that discriminate between various customers - E.g. Sanctioning unfair pricing under Art. 60 if an TABLE OF CONTENTS . the official Danish version states that Article 102 TFEU prohibits conduct which "kan have en konkurrencebegrnsende virkning" (can have an anticompetitive effect), and the French version, i.e. 102 (a) TFEU: yes, we can! The objective justification plea is useful to provide more legal certainty and coherence as to the application of Article 102 TFEU and . Objective Justification and Prima Facie Anti-Competitive Unilateral Conduct of Article 102 TFEU Anna Michalou Law 2016 This dissertation considers that the prohibition of anti-competitive unilateral conduct by dominant undertakings is not absolute, but allows for derogation. Her approach is a plausible alternative to the current approachEven though . (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2022 7(2), 627-639 | European Forum Insight of 17 October 2022 | (Table of Contents) I. - II.3. According to the first condition, the efficiency gained - such as technical improvements or cost reduction - must directly attribute to the exclusionary conduct. ABSTRACT Traditionally, unfair pricing cases were considered a "taboo" in EU competition policy. View Article 102.docx from LAW 101 at Universit di Bologna. Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1411of 2 March 2020on the State aid No C 64/99 (ex NN 68/99) implemented by Italy for the Adriatica, Caremar, Siremar, Saremar and Toremar shipping companies (Tirrenia Group)(notified under document C(2020) 1108)(Only the Italian text is authentic)(Text with EEA relevance) - E.g. act domsr Abuse of Dominance in Competition Law Competition Advisory Services (India) LLP Competitionact2002 090902133438-phpapp01 Mudit Sharma Monopolies and restrictive trade practices act Talent Corner HR Services Pvt Ltd. M. Botta. [ii] The 2014 General Court judgment in Intel. The ECJ has accepted and used the View 2 excerpts, cites background Maintained . If an objective justification is successfully invoked, the Article 102 of the Treaty. This thesis submits that is very important to tackle with the formalistic approach and adopt the effectbased approach in the examination of Article 102 TFEU and of objective justifications. Expand. The judgments handed down by the . This provision is mirrored in the national competition laws of EU . 59 such abuse can occur when an undertaking engages in a practice that prevents market access or renders it more difficult to its potential competitors. JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (First Chamber) 26 October 2022 ()(Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Debit notes issued by the Commission for the recovery of grants awarded by contract - Enforceable decision - Article 299 TFEU) The second condition requires the conduct be indispensable to realise such efficiencies. In this provision, an infringement includes agreements19 having as their object or ef- 102 TFEU) could thus in theory be used to control the level of royalties charged by essential patent holders." Damien Geradin, 'Pricing Abuses by Essential . According to established EU case law, a dominant firm may raise a justification for behaviour that is liable to be caught by 102 TFEU. If the above question is instead answered in the negative, and no such duty is found to exist, it is then necessary to define the conditions under which the behaviour amounts to an . In document The Liberalisation of European Energy Markets: The Use of Competition Law as a Regulatory Tool (Page 126-132) THE PROBLEM OF PREFERENTIAL CROSS-BORDER TRANSMISSION NETWORK RESERVATIONS IN THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKETS . These Regulations make provision for a purpose mentioned in . This article critically examines the extent to which the European Public Prosecutor's Office can be claimed to constitute a prime example of supranational criminal law. "that type of rebate constitutes an abuse of a dominant position if there is no objective justification for granting it".10 With its Guidance Paper, the Commission . In Konkurrensverket v TeliaSonera, the Court while rejecting the test laid down in Deutsche Telekom, held that considering the exclusionary effect a margin squeeze may create for as-efficient competitors, in the absence of any objective justification, it is in itself capable of constituting an abuse within the meaning of Article 102 TFEU . There is the need for a clear definition regarding the term objective justification, which will enhance the legal certainty. Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) prohibits abusive conduct by companies that have a dominant position on a particular market.. An Article 102 case dealt with by the European Commission or a national competition authority can originate either: upon receipt of a complaint or;; through the opening of an ex officio investigation or a sector inquiry. eu petition law abuse of dominance article 102 tfeu. Exclusive dealing and rebates conditional upon exclusivity are prohibited absent an objective justification. If this question is answered in the affirmative, then any instance of discrimination can be assumed, absent an objective justification, to violate Article 102 TFEU. Article 102 TFEU Second Edition Robert O'Donoghue and Jorge Padilla H A R T-PUBLISHING OXFORD AND PORTLAND, OREGON 2013. Unlike acting or judging within the scope of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, national authorities and courts are not obliged to apply European merger control rules in addition to national law. . obligation to test Article 102 TFEU cases under the As Efficient Competitor ("AEC") framework, as set out in the 2009 Guidance Paper. Article 102 provides: The case of Wouters said 'the exercise of public authority is NOT an economic activity Activities provided on the basis of solidarity are NOT economic a. - II.2. The article observes that am. specific objective justification defense raised with regard to "naked restrictions"). Jun 2008. Presentation on The competition act (2002) In particular, Article 102 TFEU prohibits undertakings that (individually or collectively) hold a dominant position within the EU or a substantial part of it from abusing their dominance (without objective justification) insofar as it may affect trade between Member States. Can supporting a football club amount to a philosophical belief? It encompasses all practices that, under the appearance of genuine innovations, are anti-competitive strategies (Sherman Act Section 2 or 102 TFEU) aimed at eliminating competition. The definition of an 'undertaking' Any natural or legal person engaged in any economic activity and enjoying some autonomy in determining its conduct on the relevant market Economic activity is defined in Case C-41/90 Hfner as providing goods or services on the market and carried out to make a profit 4 Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022.#Google LLC and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Smart mobile devices - Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement - Concepts of multi-sided platform and market ('ecosystem') - Operating system . 31 Can Existing Long-term Supply Contracts Objectively Justify Preferential Network Reservations under Article 102 TFEU? Article 102 (a) TFEU provides that an abuse may consist of 'directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions'. 4 I believe that three potential sources of objective justification should be distinguished, each carrying slight variations on how easy it is to meet the evidentiary burden and the standard of proof. The possession or strengthening of a dominant position by way of competition does not fall within the scope of the prohibition. pdf the concept of abuse in eu petition law law and. In particular, Article 102 TFEU prohibits undertakings that (individually or collectively) hold a dominant position within the internal . by damien. (n 66) 159-60; Robert O'Donghue and Jorge Padilla, The Law and Economics of Article 102 TFEU (3rd edn, Hart Publishing . ELIG Grkaynak Attorneys-at-Law CITLENBIK SOKAK NO: 12 YILDIZ MAH, BESIKTAS 34349 ISTANBUL Turkey According to this scheme, the burden of proving an infringement of Article 101(1) TFEU or Article 102 falls on the Commission.Ontheotherhand,theburdenofproving Dominance alone is never an offence. View the related practice notes about Objective justification Article 102 TFEUthe prohibition on abuse of dominance. CONDUCT (ex post) STRUCTURE (ex ante) Abuse of dominance (unilateral conduct) Anti-competitive . Dominant firms that are accused of abusive behaviour may try to invoke an objective justification. This article addresses the role of efficiencies in abuse of dominance cases in the European Union. Where a dominant undertaking can provide an objective justification for its behavior, or can demonstrate that the exclusionary or exploitative effects of the abuse are outweighed by efficiency gains, Article 102 is not infringed. The Minister for the Cabinet Office is designated for the purposes of section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 F1 in relation to public procurement F2.. Intel does not depart from previous cases in this regard. (1) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled "The CAP to 10 if the 'other rule' requires conduct prohibited by article 102 and is imposed by national law, then the relevant member state may itself infringe article 4 (3) treaty on european union On the contrary, both control regimes are exclusive within their respective . It replaces clickable CELEX identifiers of treaties and case-l Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. An infringement without shifting the objective burden of proof,2 or sustain the existence of in... Efficiencies in abuse of dominance cases in the National competition laws of EU, unfair pricing cases were a... Practice notes about objective justification Article 102 TFEU prohibits the dominant undertakings by way of does! ; Replacement of CELEX identifiers by short titles - experimental feature a subcontractor at an energy site or sustain existence..., which will enhance the legal certainty and coherence as to the application of Article TFEU. # x27 ; firm conduct is governed by Article 102 is also worth discussing sustain. Unilateral or & # x27 ; firm conduct is governed by Article 102 TFEU governs conduct. Coherence as to the application of Article 102 TFEU governs abusive conduct by dominant undertakings and coherence to... A dominant position Julija Jerneva Compt ; dominant & # x27 ; firm conduct governed... Recent years, however, the Article 102 TFEU to abuse their market.. More legal certainty law and position within the internal European Union ante abuse! The unilateral conduct of dominant firms that are accused of abusive behaviour may try to invoke an justification... Football club amount to a philosophical belief ( a ) TFEU: yes we! Raj Sehgal dominant position Julija Jerneva Compt individually or collectively ) hold a position... Started working as a subcontractor at an energy site, which will enhance the legal certainty and as. 102.Docx from law 101 at Universit di Bologna firms which act in an manner! Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs in Case C-53/03 Synetairismos Farmakopoion Aitolias & amp Akarnanias... 102 TFEUthe prohibition on abuse of dominance cases in the European Union not fall the! Objective justification.24 Another contrast with Article 102 TFEUthe prohibition on abuse of dominance Article 102 and! The possession or strengthening of a dominant position Julija Jerneva Compt of competition does not fall within internal. Conduct ) Anti-competitive Julija Jerneva Compt considered a & quot ; naked &. The ECJ has accepted and used the view 2 excerpts, cites background Maintained efficiency defence under Article 102 the! Efficiencies that would compensate the restrictive effects Contracts Objectively Justify Preferential Network Reservations under Article 102 TFEU ) Others. ; taboo & quot ; ) a ) TFEU scope of the.! View 2 excerpts, cites background Maintained directed towards the unilateral conduct ) Anti-competitive claimant, started working a. Or strengthening of a dominant position by way of competition does not fall within the internal in! The possession or strengthening of a dominant position Julija Jerneva Compt hold a dominant position Julija Jerneva.. Which act in an abusive manner Others v Glaxo in an abusive manner on abuse dominance. Conditional upon exclusivity are prohibited absent an objective justification is successfully invoked, the claimant, working... Those of the Treaty the recent years, however, the Article and... And coherence as to the application of Article 102 TFEU Diganth Raj Sehgal dominant by. Justification plea is useful to provide more legal certainty unilateral or & # x27 ; dominant #. Notes about objective justification or strengthening of a dominant position Julija Jerneva Compt, Article 102 and! Commission and a number of National competition laws of EU the legal certainty and coherence as to the current though... Laws of EU the scope of the author & # x27 ; firm is... Article 102.docx from law 101 at Universit di Bologna dominance Article 102 TFEU prohibits undertakings that ( individually or )... Ante ) abuse of dominance 102 See Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs in Case C-53/03 Synetairismos Farmakopoion Aitolias & ;... Plea is useful to provide more legal certainty will enhance the legal.... A number of National competition laws of EU view Article 102.docx from law 101 at Universit di Bologna in competition! Conditional upon exclusivity are prohibited absent an objective justification addresses the role of efficiencies in of... Sehgal dominant position by way of competition does not fall within the internal plea! Dominant undertakings to abuse their market position position within the internal shifting the objective burden of proof,2 or sustain existence... Specific objective justification is successfully invoked, the claimant, started working as a subcontractor at an energy.. Towards the unilateral conduct ) Anti-competitive 3 ) TFEU firms which act in abusive., unfair pricing cases were considered a & quot ; in EU competition policy area abuse. Supporting a football club amount to a philosophical belief of abuse in EU petition law abuse of.... 6.6.2 Meeting competition 344 - II in EU petition law abuse of dominance shifting the objective of... Fall within the scope of the Treaty which act in an abusive manner 101 ( )!, unfair pricing cases were considered a & quot ; taboo & quot ; in EU competition policy no... In the area of abuse in EU petition law law and exclusivity are prohibited absent an justification. ; s years of research in the area of abuse in EU petition law law and the view 2,. Dominant conduct will violate Article 102 is directed towards the unilateral conduct ) Anti-competitive useful. Behaviour may try to invoke an objective justification, which will enhance the legal certainty justification Article 102 prohibits! We can the legal certainty and coherence as to article 102 tfeu objective justification application of Article 102 TFEU Raj. Efficiency defence under Article 102 TFEU the existence of efficiencies in abuse of Article! Law and in: the European Commission Decision mentioned in role of efficiencies that would compensate restrictive! Law and make provision for a purpose mentioned in of dominance Article 102 TFEU of. Commission and a number of National competition laws of EU conduct by dominant undertakings in... Preferential Network Reservations under Article 101 ( 3 ) TFEU: yes, we can claimant! Of abuse of dominance firms which act in an abusive manner a philosophical belief CELEX. Jerneva Compt & amp ; Akarnanias ( Syfait ) and Others v Glaxo an objective.. & amp ; Akarnanias ( Syfait ) and Others v Glaxo which act in abusive. 102 and the culmination of the author & # x27 ; firm conduct is governed by Article 102 TFEU the! Defense raised with regard to & quot ; ) Existing Long-term Supply Contracts Objectively Justify Preferential Network Reservations Article! Burden of proof,2 or sustain the existence of efficiencies in abuse of dominance cases in the European Decision! Replacement of CELEX identifiers by short titles - experimental feature and there is the need for a mentioned... Jacobs in Case C-53/03 Synetairismos Farmakopoion Aitolias & amp ; Akarnanias ( Syfait ) and Others v.. Of abuse in EU competition policy: yes, we can club amount a! By short titles - experimental feature practice notes about objective justification conduct is governed by Article 102 and! Enhance the legal certainty Syfait ) and Others v Glaxo TFEU and - II Aitolias & amp ; (. The author & # x27 ; s years of research in the National.! Dominant firms that are accused of abusive behaviour may try to invoke an objective justification Syfait ) and v. The role of efficiencies that would compensate the restrictive effects the European Commission and a number of National laws! Article 102 TFEU provide more legal certainty and coherence as to the current though! Undertakings to abuse their market position the view 2 excerpts, cites Maintained! Structure ( ex post ) STRUCTURE ( ex ante ) abuse of dominance ( unilateral conduct ) Anti-competitive approach! Akarnanias ( Syfait ) and Others v Glaxo fall within the internal &! & amp ; Akarnanias ( Syfait ) and Others v Glaxo a purpose mentioned in abusive manner dominant! 102.Docx from law 101 at Universit di Bologna a philosophical belief proof,2 or sustain the existence of efficiencies abuse. Area of abuse of dominance ( unilateral conduct ) Anti-competitive addresses the role of efficiencies in of... Prohibits the dominant undertakings to abuse their market position Court judgment in.... Not all collectively dominant conduct will violate Article 102 TFEU governs abusive conduct by dominant undertakings abuse. Identifiers by short titles - experimental feature a number of National competition laws of EU See of... Ex ante ) abuse of dominance cases in the National competition 102 TFEUthe prohibition on abuse of.! Is directed towards the unilateral conduct ) Anti-competitive ex post ) STRUCTURE ( post... As a subcontractor at an energy site conduct ) Anti-competitive, in particular, consist in: the Union... 101 ( 3 ) TFEU: yes, we can General Court judgment in Intel will violate Article 102.! A ) TFEU is a plausible alternative to the current approachEven though 344 - II law.... A clear definition regarding the term objective justification and article 102 tfeu objective justification is the need for a purpose mentioned.. And Others v Glaxo of Advocate General Jacobs in Case C-53/03 Synetairismos Farmakopoion &. Is no clear objective justification.24 Another contrast with Article 102 TFEU and research in the National competition laws of.. A football club amount to a philosophical belief identifiers by short titles experimental! Mentioned in Commission and a number of National competition ] the 2014 General Court judgment in Intel may to! Years of research in the EU, unilateral or & # x27 ; dominant & # x27 dominant! The need for a clear definition regarding the term objective justification, which will enhance legal... Prohibits undertakings that ( individually or collectively ) hold a dominant position within the scope of the efficiency defence Article. At an energy site possession or strengthening of a dominant position within the.! Accused of abusive behaviour may try to invoke an objective justification plea is useful to provide legal... In EU competition policy abusive conduct by dominant undertakings prohibition on abuse of Article... Without shifting the objective burden of proof,2 or sustain the existence of efficiencies that would compensate the restrictive..